Sunday, August 13, 2017

Liberty University PSYC 101 Discussion Board 1 thread solution right

Liberty University PSYC 101 Discussion Board 1 thread solution right
General Psychology DB1 thread forum
You can choose it from many different papers.
Plagiarism Free

Topic: Can You Multi-Task?

Prior to this course and reading the chapter, what were your thoughts on multi-tasking, in general? Do you think you are a good multi-
tasker? Why or why not? Now, try the experiment on p. 139 of your textbook in the “Try this Out” section. What were your results? For this thread, address the following:

·         What were your thoughts on multi-tasking (in general and applied to yourself)?
o    When driving, what might you be seen doing (e.g., eating, talking on the cell phone, etc.)?
o    What about when studying (e.g., checking Facebook, cooking dinner, listening to music, etc.)?
·         After completing the activity on p. 139, what were your findings?
·         Apply the concepts of divided attention and focused awareness to your findings and/or experience while completing the activity. Cite the textbook.
·         Do you think there are some tasks that are easier to multi-task on than others? If so, which ones? If not, why not?

Replies: It’s Public Service Announcement (PSA) Time!

In reply to one of your classmates, discuss your recommendations for what to do or not do while driving. Support your points with evidence from the textbook.

In reply to another classmate, discuss your recommendations for studying. What activities might be more or less distracting? Again, be sure to support your recommendation with evidence or concepts discussed in the textbook.

In both replies, be realistic (e.g., many of us will still eat on a long road trip). Instead of prescribing a specific list, consider recommending general principles to consider. Include points related to levels of consciousness and attention. Also support claims with textbook citations.

Submit your thread by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of Module/Week 2, and submit your replies by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of the same module/week.

Thursday, August 10, 2017

Liberty University THEO 104 Discussion Board 2 thread solution right

Liberty University THEO 104 Discussion Board 2 thread solution right
Introduction to Christian Thought DB2 thread forum
You can choose it from many different papers
Plagiarism Free

Topic: In addition to the readings for this module/week, visit the website for Liberty University’s Center for Apologetics and Cultural Engagement (ACE) at http://www.liberty.edu/ace/index.cfm?PID=33065. Watch the following video on the website to prepare for this Discussion Board Forum:
·         JD Greear Interview Assurance
After completing the readings for the week and watching the videos, please respond to the following Discussion Board Forum prompt:
“From a biblical perspective, what is salvation (include at least 2 Scripture verses to support your answer)?”


Submit your thread by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of Module/Week 5. Do not begin posting replies until Module/Week 6.
Submit your replies to 3 classmates’ threads by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of Module/Week 6.


Liberty University THEO 104 Discussion Board 1 thread solution right

Liberty University THEO 104 Discussion Board 1 thread solution right
Introduction to Christian Thought DB1 thread forum
You can choose it from many different papers
Plagiarism Free

Topic: In addition to the readings for this module/week, visit the website for Liberty University’s Center for Apologetics and Cultural Engagement (ACE) at http://www.liberty.edu/ace/index.cfm?PID=33065. Watch the following 2 videos on the website to prepare for this Discussion Board Forum:
·         ACE Interview Mark Strauss “General Reliability of the Gospels”
·         ACE Interview Mark Strauss “Reliability of the NT Manuscripts”
After completing the readings for the module/week and watching the videos, please respond to the following Discussion Board Forums prompt:
“What are some of the most convincing arguments for the reliability of Scripture (pick two arguments and explain)?”


Submit your thread by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of Module/Week 2. Do not begin posting replies until Module/Week 3.
Submit your replies to 3 classmates' threads by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of Module/Week 3.


Liberty University PHIL 201 Discussion Board 2 thread solution right

Liberty University PHIL 201 Discussion Board 2 thread solution right
Philosophy and Contemporary Ideas DB2 thread Group Discussion Board thread forum
You can choose it from many different papers.
Plagiarism Free

Group Discussion Board Forum 2 Instructions
To Torture or Not to Torture
Note: In order to fulfill this assignment, you need to have read chapters 5–7, 14 from the Holmes text. If you have not done so, please stop now and read that material.

One of the ethical controversies of recent times is the practice of using torture in obtaining information from suspected terrorists or those with knowledge of terrorist activities. Some believe that the current threat of terrorism warrants such drastic means while others believe that torture is never a justifiable manner in handling prisoners of war.

Suppose a situation presents itself in which we have strong reasons to believe a major attack on U.S. soil is immanent and that many lives will be put in danger. Security forces have captured a terrorist whom they have very good reasons to believe has vital information that can lead to thwarting this attack. They have tried the usual means of obtaining information from the prisoner and none of them have been successful. His resolve not to talk is quite strong. However, security forces now consider torturing the prisoner and believe with a high degree of probability that his resolve will be broken and he will supply the needed information. Should they torture the prisoner?

Submit both your thread and your reply for Group Discussion Board Forum 2 by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Friday of Module/Week 8.

Topic: To Torture or Not to Torture

Note: In order to fulfill this assignment, you need to have read the Group Discussion Board Forum 2 Instructions and the following chapters from Holmes: 
chs. 4–7, 14. If you have not done so, stop and read that material.

For your thread, post an answer to the following 2 questions with at least 350 words:
1.       From your understanding of Holmes’ discussions, explain how each of the following theories might answer the question: utilitarianism, Kantian duty-based ethics, virtue ethics, and Christian-principle based ethics.
2.       Select the theory you think is the most appropriate to take in this case and explain why.
For your reply, locate a member of your group with whom you disagree and tell him/her why you disagree with at least 200 words. The disagreement could be over which view he/she took or his/her understanding of the other views.

Any quotes from sources must be cited and will not count towards your word count. Your thread and reply are both due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on 
Friday of Module/Week 8.


Liberty University PHIL 201 Discussion Board 1 thread solution right

Liberty University PHIL 201 Discussion Board 1 thread solution right
Philosophy and Contemporary Ideas DB1 thread Group Discussion Board thread forum
You can choose it from many different papers.
Plagiarism Free

Group Discussion Board Forum 1 Instructions
Androids and the Mind/Body Problem
Note: In order to fulfill this assignment you need to have read the Star Trek synopsis and/or episode found in the Reading & Study folder along with chapter 3 of the Hasker text. You also need to have viewed the video presentation “The Mind/Body Problem” and the PointeCast presentation “Proposed Solutions to the Mind/Body Problem.” If you have not done so, stop now and read that material.

Science fiction literature often raises philosophical issues and is a great source for philosophical speculation. This is especially true for the mind/body problem. For example, it is common in science fiction literature to encounter androids. An android is a robot which resembles a human being in appearance and behavior. Examples of androids in science fiction books, television programs, or films are numerous (Star Trek, Star Wars, Aliens, Terminator, A.I., I, Robot, etc.). In reality, many computer scientists are currently working in the area of “artificial intelligence” or machines that can “think for themselves.” Many computer scientists believe this is the first step in creating these androids of the future and that in time the distinction between man and machine will be practically erased. These scientists speculate that androids with super-computer brains will have thoughts, beliefs, feelings, and desires just like humans. Therefore, some argue that they will also have the same rights, responsibilities, and privileges that all humans have and should be treated as thus.

Do you see problems with this view of the future? Do you think machines can ever become persons?

In order to explore this question, let us consider Season 2, Episode 9 or Episode 35 (of total episodes) entitled “The Measure of a Man” from the popular television series, Star Trek: The Next Generation. It would be helpful if you could view this episode (perhaps you can rent it from your local video store or Netflix), but I have provided a synopsis so that you can fulfill this assignment without viewing the episode.

Your thread must address the first question below. You may also address several of the other questions as well, but the bulk of your response must be on the first question and relating the story to Hasker, chapter 3 as well as both the video presentation “The Mind/Body Problem” and the PointeCast presentation “Proposed Solutions to the Mind/Body Problem.”

  • From your reading of Hasker, and using the categories he uses, what view of the mind/body problem do you think is exhibited by Picard? By Maddox? Support your answer.
  • Maddox lists three criteria for a being to be sentient: intelligence, self-awareness, and consciousness. Are these adequate? Can you think of other properties or characteristics a being needs to have in order to be considered a “person?” What might they be?
  • Do you think that artificial intelligence to the level as it is presented in the story will someday be possible? Why or why not?
  • Do you think Maddox is right when he claims that Picard is being “irrational and emotional” in his view of Data?
  • Do you agree with the JAG officer’s final ruling? Why or why not?
  • If A.I. does become possible, will we have obligations to treat machines “ethically?”

Submit your thread by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Friday of Module/Week 3 and submit your reply by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of Module/Week 3.



Liberty University HIUS 222 Discussion Board 2 thread solution right

Liberty University HIUS 222 Discussion Board 2 thread solution right
Survey of American History II DB2 thread forum
You can choose it from many different papers.
Plagiarism Free


Topic: Jackie Robinson

In American history, unfortunately both Christians and non-Christians have often supported discrimination against other groups. An example is the treatment of African Americans. In the case study about 
Jackie Robinson, you will see how one African American met these challenges. Based on the evidence in the case study, what do you believe was Jackie Robinson’s greatest accomplishment? Why? 

Submit your thread by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of Module/Week 6 and submit your replies by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of the same module/week.

Liberty University HIUS 222 Discussion Board 1 thread solution right

Liberty University HIUS 222 Discussion Board 1 thread solution right
Survey of American History II DB1 thread forum
You can choose it from many different papers.
Plagiarism Free

Topic: 1877 Railroad Strike

One of the objectives in history, as a Christian, is to draw conclusions based on the known evidence as opposed to drawing conclusions based on emotions or preconceived ideas (see Luke 1:1–4). Based on the evidence provided in the case study about the 
1877 Railroad Strike, did the railroad companies or the workers have the strongest argument? Why or why not? 

Submit your thread by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of Module/Week 2 and submit your replies by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of the same module/week.